If I'd explain it as using cofferdams ( temporarily structures) to raise the water instead of the traditional lowering. Is that better for you?
I'm 100% sure that using simple solutions to hard problems is not always thought off when something is not used in it's "traditional" sense.
Sometimes outsiders give another POV that could be actually useful. And sometimes it isn't.
No need to get rude for that... Perhaps try some constructive feedback on why it shouldn't work next time? :)
PS. Before you misinterpret my words again. I'm saying that the concept is simple ( raising the water level), not the execution of it. Since on this scale every solution is harder to execute.
If I'd explain it as using cofferdams ( temporarily structures) to raise the water instead of the traditional lowering. Is that better for you?
I'm 100% sure that using simple solutions to hard problems is not always thought off when something is not used in it's "traditional" sense.
Sometimes outsiders give another POV that could be actually useful. And sometimes it isn't.
No need to get rude for that... Perhaps try some constructive feedback on why it shouldn't work next time? :)
PS. Before you misinterpret my words again. I'm saying that the concept is simple ( raising the water level), not the execution of it. Since on this scale every solution is harder to execute.
Edit: It's already been confirmed by another poster that it should work in theory: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26587692 ( with pro's and cons)