Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> Childcare is much cheaper in other countries, even relative to the lower earning potentials.

Cheaper, or more heavily subsidized? It's an important difference.

For the record: I'm not opposed to subsidies, and think the US need them in a lot more areas (and a lot more government involvement in the economy, in general).



It is both subsidized and cheaper but that word sort of implies parents (and especially non-parents) may be worse off in the end, which I think is an unfortunate way of thinking about these subsidies.

Given the cost of health and life insurance, unemployment insurance, paid vacation (4-6 weeks generally), healthcare (I once paid $32 for 5 weeks hospital care), paid parental leave, childcare, school and university, I am confident this more than makes up for the higher taxes. I believe people are calmer when the risk of living is low. No broken leg or depression will set us back financially, and if we have a few too many kids they can all go to college even if we don't earn much. And both parents can work (70% at least) while their kids go to daycare. This is at least an extra 5 years of salary compared to supporting a stay-at-home parent.

It might not be charming to brag about all our advantages, but as a European I really want e.g. Americans to know that there is another way. Life doesn't have to be about chasing money until you can afford to live.


The word subsidy does not carry the connotation you suggest it does. One is supposed to subsidize good things


With respect to healthcare it's both cheaper and subsidized.


US collects your taxes and then spends it for Dept of War, Corporate Subsidies, Farming Subsidies etc etc....

The rest of the world collects taxes and spends it on their future, education, health, child care...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: