Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I get the sentiment, but if you can't acknowledge that AI is useful and currently a lot better than search for a great many things, then it's hard to have a rational conversation.


why do they need to acknowledge something outside of the point they're trying to make?


Because it was a middlebrow dismissal of the GP


because that's how conversations work. anything less is sparkling debate.


how is it useful to be fed misleading nonsense?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: