To be influenced in this subtle ways at such a high level. AI is trained by big tech corporations to accomplish their goals. To use any of it for policy making is a horrifying step in the wrong direction.
But that is the goal of tech companies by giving the service at a loss. To make people depend on it until big tech corporations have control of your own thoughts.
I couldn't agree more! AI isn't a universal, omniscient god, but rather a human-created tool. The knowledge it possesses isn't necessarily correct and may even carry political biases. It would be extremely dangerous for a nation's top leadership to rely on AI.
The danger is not on such high level, as all decisions are highly scrutinized by the public.
But on the lower levels, where the insight is much much narrower and your ability to protest or influence the outcome is near zero... That I am worried about.
Municipals, councils, social services, make decisions that directly effect peoples lives. E.g. building permits, custody cases, restaurant permits and so so much more low level things.
And I somewhat understand, if you have a stack of cases to go through and ChatGPT can shorten it from 6 hours to 30 seconds, then why not? Never mind the details, if the outcomes at a glance seems match the average then lets go.
It is not. Ask your family, friends, acquaintances how much they use AI in their work and even at home to get through paperwork.
I am very interested in new technology and how people use it, I've brought it up a lot in my own circles and encountered several occasions where some "stop thinking" and takes the output from ChatGPT as "done-and-dusted".
And remember that people at municipal offices are just normal humans like you and me. Most just want to get things over with so they can go home, and AI is a convenient tool to help with that.
But that is the goal of tech companies by giving the service at a loss. To make people depend on it until big tech corporations have control of your own thoughts.
A prime minister should know better.