Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I don't condone what he did, but...

1. His intention wasn't to destroy in order to build resilience.

2. His targets weren't random.



He saw a tech-dependent society as being fragile. Towards the end of the book he talked about subverting the current system which he clearly wanted to destroy before it got out of hand.


I was going for something more like a well-timed stress test, and less like a program of willful destruction.


I'm dense. Who are you two talking about?


Unabomber




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: