It may be heretical but I tend to agree with this. Also at my workplace we tend to be standardized around PRs doing squash merges so there’s not really much point in having detailed interim commit messages anyway. As long as the PR has good information (and of course is linked to useful work items with good information) that’s usually good enough for me.
(Of course more often than not people have empty/useless linked work items, and PRs with useless titles and descriptions but that’s a whole different kind of problem.)
(Of course more often than not people have empty/useless linked work items, and PRs with useless titles and descriptions but that’s a whole different kind of problem.)