Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The parent wrote: "They did it because they overextended themselves to get a house in a good school district and then one of them lost their job or they had a medical emergency."

So, they overextended themselves and THEN lost a job or had a medical emergency. The problem is people choose to live on the edge financially, which I think is irresponsible, especially if you have others who depend on you for their life.



From an outsiders perspective of the US --- If you have a $200K medical emergency -- I'm not sure how you prepare yourself for that...


Health insurance, but the problem is that pre-existing condition clauses can prevent you from getting insurance coverage at any cost.

The other alternative is simply "die", but rationally, there's little reason to choose that over bankruptcy. I wonder what happens to medical debts if you commit suicide over them... (Or what happens if you try to commit suicide and fail?)


"So, they overextended themselves and THEN lost a job or had a medical emergency. The problem is people choose to live on the edge financially, which I think is irresponsible, especially if you have others who depend on you for their life."

This is exactly true. Someone above mentioned that people buy houses, to get into a good school district. Why can't we allow people in bad school districts to go to another school? I will give you the answer: teacher's unions.

I always try to have at least 6 months (IE: I could survive for six months without a job) salary in the bank. I got laid off a couple of weeks ago and now I'm fine. Many people I know, that decided to live beyond their means, are now worried that if they lose their job, they will be in trouble.

Everyone wants to blame the medical system (which does need work) and ignore personal responsibility. Medical emergencies that result in bankruptcy probably happen to less than 5% of the population. It's almost as bad as the terrorist fear mongering.


Teacher's unions???

Why don't we have state-wide, or at least city-wide financing of schools? That would take away the school district issue entirely.


Times your "probably less than 5%" by twelve and you're closer to the truth:

http://articles.cnn.com/2009-06-05/health/bankruptcy.medical...


> Times your "probably less than 5%" by twelve and you're closer to the truth:

Nope. They miscounted and several other problems. (When someone goes broke because they're an alcoholic and lose their job, do you really think that's a medical bankruptcy?)

Google "mcardle atlantic medical" and start reading.





Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: