Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | jcarrano's commentslogin

They "conveyed" the software, according to GPL wording. They violation is towards the original software's authors.


That’s true, but the contract thing is also separately true. The TV came with a notice stating that it used GPL’d software and offering to convey the source to anyone who wrote them. That’s a valid contract, which the SFC tried to act on. Vizio rebuffed them, so one of the issues before the court is a literal contract violation.


With master gone, it's time to get rid of the man-pages, which were invented to mansplain commands by bearded men in the 70s.


I eagerly await that change.

However, "man" originally means "people" as in "mankind", or "human". It's only recently (c 1400) that it replaced "wer" ("wif" being the feminine noun) as meaning males (or mid 20th century for becoming an exclamation).


In addition, this is entirely pointless, because man is short for manual, which comes from manus, the hand, because it is something, that you should keep at hand.


The problem with asbestos is that, due to its structure, it keeps breaking in the longitudinal direction, making thinner and thinner until it is the size of chromosomes. Physical interference with DNA is how it causes cancer.

My understanding is that basalt fibers seem to be glassy, not crystalline, so the breaking does not happen.


The source material is crystalline, but it becomes somewhat glassy during the fiber manufacture, when it is cooled too fast to crystallize completely.

Asbestos is made from some silicates (pyroxenes or amphiboles) which contain long covalent chains of silicon and oxygen atoms, which are more likely to separate than to break transversally.

Basalt also contains pyroxenes and amphiboles, but they are mixed with other kinds of silicates and they also have a different chemical composition than those of asbestos, so as far as it is known for now the probability of breaking into very thin fibers is very low for basalt fibers.

It is plausible that basalt fibers should be safer, because unlike with asbestos, which is made from rather rare minerals, basalt covers a large fraction of the surface of the Earth, so if basalt were dangerous erosion should have made harmful basalt fragments abundant in the environment.


Is it correct so think that the least crystalline it ends up being, the more tensile strength it has ?


No, the greater tensile strength of basalt fiber versus glass fiber is due to it being partly crystallized, similarly to the greater strength of glass-ceramic vessels (i.e. which are made from a glass for easier formability, but then they are crystallized by a heat treatment) versus glass vessels.

While there are glasses much stronger than ordinary glass, there are a lot of even stronger ceramics, which are (poly-)crystalline.

Glasses have many advantages vs. other materials, e.g. easy processing for making any shapes, including fibers, no porosity, chemical resistance, optical transparency and so on, but strength is not one of them.

The glass content of the basalt fibers is useful for allowing them to be drawn into fibers, by being soft enough for this even at a temperature under the melting point of the basalt.


> Physical interference with DNA is how it causes cancer.

Is there a reference for that, because it's curious. (As in I really hope you have a reference to read.)

I'd thought I had seen that repeated scarring (from being not broken down) upregulates cellular replacement rate, or concomitant inflammation were suspect.


"Long asbestos fibers have been shown to interfere physically with the mitotic spindle and cause chromosomal damage"

[1] https://archive.cdc.gov/www_atsdr_cdc_gov/csem/asbestos/how_...


super interesting. thanks for following up, because i'll read it!


Basalt also interacts with DNA, hence some origin of life theories try to feature it


My bartender told me the other night that as long as I have 2 cups of black coffee and some red meat before drinking, it will coat my liver and prevent cirrhosis. I'm wondering if I should have him check out the mole on my arm, just to put my mind at ease. He would probably volunteer to be an experimental subject to prove this glass theory.


Having a separation between the "pure language" and the library is a requirement if you want to have a language that can be used for low-level components, like kernels or bare-bones software.

I don't think this is possible in a language that needs a runtime, like Go.


That was the first product released >10 years ago at my previous job [1]. The idea did not quite catch on, though, and the product was repurposed (successfully) as an OEM charger. There is not a lot of power available on street lamps and charging at 3.6kW is kind of slow. Consider that with almost the same hardware (especially the same expensive parts) and three-phase current, 22kW are possible.

It might turn out differently in the US, but it is hardly a new idea.

[1] https://www.bender.de/ebee/berlin/


3.6 kW gives between 10 and 20 km of range per hour of charging depending on the vehicle you have. This is plenty fast enough for overnight charging.


Yes I've never bothered with a higher output for my own home charger, a standard outlet is plenty if you're parked every night


No point whatsoever. If you have to deal with money you never use floating point. Either use arbitrary precision, or integers with a sufficiently small base like blockchains do (which can be also though of as fixed point). Also you would never be multiplying two money value (there are no "square dollars").


I have the HP logic analyzer that runs HP-UX. To me it's crazy that I can connect to it with a 2025 Linux OS and run X11 apps remotely out of the box.


It's too bad they went to Windows later on. Having the Unix environment available makes the older stuff really flexible.


If it's the model I'm thinking of, it's basically a 9000/712. An easy way to get a PA-RISC workstation from someone who doesn't realize what it actually is. :)


I canceled my Spotify subscription because it would not let me "reset" the algorithm to get fresh suggestions.

A "discovery algorithm" that I used (works great for jazz) consisted on looking up which musicians played on an album that I liked on discogs and searching for more albums from them.


Annoying right?

I am also a huge Discogs fan and unheard.fm actually leverages their APIs to aid with discovery ;)


After waiting 3+ months for the Finanzamt to respond.


Carl Sagan doxxed the Earth with the Voyager disk.


The probe (and disc) are infintesmally small in the grand scheme of things, if there's anything that would reveal the position of Earth it's our own signal emissions, which are well ahead of the Voyager probes (the first radio signals are now ~125 light years away. No idea if they can still be detected among background radiation though)


There's a joke about a speeding BMW that crashes into the back of a hay cart. The driver complains that the cart should had a red rag to signal its presence. The carter responds "you didn't see the cart, would have you seen the rag?"

The info in Voyager is just a vanity plate... or a time capsule. Nothing wrong with that anyway. Some time in the future, humans will locate it and put it back in a museum.


To be honest, I thought that was going to end with “you were going so fast, it turned into a blue flag”


[flagged]


I notice that there's not a single reference in that entire response. How do you know which parts of it are hallucinated and which aren't?


It will take tens of thousands of years for Voyagers to reach only the nearest stars, so I don't think that disk is really a problem. Any alien civilisation that could reaches the probes in the near future will already know about us or will find out soon after anyway even without the information on that disk.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: